BKV case: Hagyó didn’t wriggled necks

The transportation company’s technological deputy CEO on his hearing as a witness, farther refiner his incriminatory statements against Hagyó Miklós, former deputy lord mayor, who is the main defendant of the BKV case.



On the Kecskemét Tribunal Takács Péter’s testimony as a witness what he started on Tuesday and continued on Thursday, it still mostly reflected his subjective opinion.

For example it turned out that he didn’t mean that „Hagyó Miklós wriggled Balog Zsolt’s (former CEO of the BKV) neck” as word for word, he meant it indirectly. 

BKV case: the prosecution who built upon to a gossip

BKV case: the prosecution who built upon to a gossip

After the two weeks break the BKV case came back with bloopers to the Kecskemét Tribunal. The witness of the prosecution said on Tuesday that he made his incriminatory testimony based on gossips and his own theory. „They gossiped that Balogh Zsolt fear from Hagyó Miklós” – penned/said as a witness the present deputy CEO of the BKV, Takács Péter, alluded to the relationship between the former CEO of the transportation company and the former deputy lord mayor from MSZP.

With his hearing the prosecution tried to prove that Hagyó could bring pressure on the leaders of the BKV and that around their communicational contracts they had bawdy-house at the BKV. Anyway Takács tenderized all his earlier, incriminatory statements, he couldn’t name documentation proof, and according to his saying, he threw out to the suspicious contract to the garbage.

                                     

(Photo source: www.mercus.hu)

Before the hearing of the witness, Homonnai János prosecutor observed about the testimony of Csapó Gábor Olympic champion that „on his own experience” and according to the inspector of the allegiance of the rights, the BKV default with the expectations with the handicapped people. With this comment putatively he wanted to save the awkward moment where he was put into on the hearing of the water polo player who popularized the BKV. The prosecutor earlier – consonant with the indictment – said that the contracts with the Csapó Bt. was unneeded, when he financed the sport training of the sporting handicapped children from the incomings/proceeds of that contract.

Earlier the prosecutor asked from the Olympic champion who was heard as a witness, that upon what ground can he uses the swimming pools what gave home for his school. Csapó at that time told to the prosecutor with a general serenity that a lot of people know him.

For that matter the hearing of Takács Péter started hard, because the prosecution had to do change on the indictment what they continuously changed already. At this time the prosecutors rewrote the charges with the amount of a few contracts.

For the calling of a lawyer Homonnai had to answer for the question that where did the records of the questionings of Horváth Éva disappear where they pell-mell the dates. Now the prosecution alluded to „unintended clerical error” and „clamps and mixing of the documents” which similar to an earlier case connected to Hagyó with the forgery accusation. Horváth Éva wasn’t satisfied with the answer and similarly to the lawyer of Hagyó she indicated that the dates are still not good on the documents.

NÉPSZAVA-information

Source: http://www.nepszava.hu/articles/article.php?id=636479

Original:

BKV-per: pletykára alapozó ügyészség

Címkék: kecskemét hagyó miklós ügyészség bkv per balog zsolt | Szerző: Hagyó Dosszié | 5:25 pm

Bakiparádéval tért vissza két hetes szünet után a BKV-per a Kecskeméti Törvényszékre. A vád tanúja keddi meghallgatásán elmondta, hogy pletykákra és saját teóriájára alapozta terhelő vallomásait. "Azt pletykálták, hogy Balogh Zsolt tartott Hagyó Miklóstól" - fogalmazott tanúként a BKV jelenlegi vezérigazgató-helyettese Takács Péter, utalva a közlekedési cég volt vezetője és a korábbi MSZP-s főpolgármester-helyettes kapcsolatára.

Meghallgatásával az ügyészség azt próbálta bizonyítani, hogy Hagyó nyomást gyakorolhatott a BKV vezetőire, és hogy a kommunikációs szerződések körül "kupleráj" volt a BKV-nál. Takács amúgy lényegében minden korábbi, terhelő állítását puhította, okirati bizonyítékot megnevezni nem tudott, a gyanús szerződéseket állítása szerint ugyanis kidobta a szemetesbe.

                           

(Fotó forrása: www.mercus.hu)

A tanúmeghallgatás előtt Homonnai János ügyész Csapó Gábor olimpiai bajnok vízilabdázó korábbi meghallgatására visszautalva észrevételezte, hogy "személyes tapasztalatai" és az állampolgári jogok biztosa szerint a BKV nem tett eleget a fogyatékosokkal szembeni elvárásoknak. Ezzel a hozzászólással feltehetőleg azt a kínos helyzetet próbálta menteni, amibe a BKV-t népszerűsítő vízilabdázó meghallgatásán került. Az ügyész ugyanis korábban - a vádirattal egybecsengően - szükségtelennek nevezte a Csapó Bt. szerződését, amelynek bevételéből a sportoló fogyatékos gyermekek ingyenes sportképzését finanszírozta. 

Korábban az ügyész a tanúként meghallgatott olimpiai bajnoktól azt is megtudakolta, hogy milyen alapon használhatja az iskolájának otthont adó uszoda termeit. Csapó akkor általános derültséget okozva elmondta az ügyésznek, hogy elég sokan ismerik őt.

Takács Péter meghallgatása egyébként nehezen kezdődött, ugyanis az ügyészségnek ismételten változtatnia kellett a folyamatosan átírt vádiraton. Ezúttal néhány szerződés összegével összefüggésben írták át az ügyészek a vádat. 

Ügyvédi kérdésre válaszolva Homonnainak arra is felelnie kellett, hová lettek H. Éva össze-vissza dátumozott kihallgatási jegyzőkönyvei. A korábbi, Hagyóval kapcsolatban az ügyészség által elkövetett okirat-hamisításra hasonlító üggyel kapcsolatban a vádhatóság most "nem szándékos elírásokra" és "dokumentumok összefogására, elkeveredésére" hivatkozott. H. Évát nem elégítette ki a válasz, és Hagyó védőjéhez hasonlóan jelezte, a dátumok még mindig nem stimmelnek az iratokon.

NÉPSZAVA-információ /

Orban's court is running, Tasz: Appoint court is dangerous!

Tünde Handó for the trial of the Hagyó-case appointed that court, which is sentenced Zuschalg for eight and half years imprisonment.

The Hungarian Helsinki Committee and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (TASZ) keep very solicitous and incompatible with the requirement of the decent proceeding that regulation, what makes possible that the president of the National Judical Office appoint a different court from the venue for the proceeding's conduct, and attract the president to not give place for such appointments henceforward.- announced the TASZ.



(Photo source: fn.hir24.hu)

The president of the National Judical Office (OBH) used her right what recorded in the basic law's temporary commision, and for nine judical proceeding she appointed countryside courts. The reason of the appointment was the over load of the Court of Budapest. 

The Court of Budapest would send the Hagyó-case to another court

The Court of Budapest ask for to the transference of the Miklós Hagyó and his partner's case, and an other seeded case.

On Tuesday, the president of the Court of Budapest proposed at the president of the National Judicial Office(OBH) to transfer two high priority case- informed the Court of Budapest. That Tünde Handó is the president of the OBH, who is József Szájer fidesz-party politician's wife, the family friend of Viktor Orbán head of government, and whose nomination was attecked many times. 


(Photo source: nol.hu)

The announcement not tells, but according to the communicated details from one of these cases, one proceeding is Miklós Hagy formes socialistoc deputy lord mayor and his partner's case. How they wrote in their announcement, the president asked that, to appoint another court what has similar competence with the Court of Budapest, for Norbert W and his 27 others commited with especially significant financial detriment caused authorial or coherence with infrigement of literary property felony and other felonies, or rather Miklós H and his 14 others commited in a criminal organization, misappropriation which caused an especially huge financial detriment and becaouse of other felonies trial.

The Constitutional Court is hears the president of the National Judicial Office behind closed doors

According to the Institution of Eötvös Károly, the Hungarian Helsinki Comittee and the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union it is injuring the power of the state's decision-making public, the right of the access of the public utility informations and the principle of the fair proceeding, that the Constitutional Court is hearing the president of the National Judical Office behind closed doors.



(Photo source: mno.hu)

According to the announcement of the president of the Constitutional Court (AB) is gonig to hearing Tünde Handó the president of the National Judical Office (OBH) with the public lock-out, in coherence of the Hagyó-case complaint of the constitutinal right's consideration. The basic of the proceeding is that the president of the OBH transposed the case from Kecskemét to Budapest. The petitoners of the complaint of the constitutional right together with other things traversed that about the case-transference only the prosecution service evolved his opinions, the accuseds and their defenders not. 

That is how they triald the accuseds of the BKV-case

The criminal suit, what noted as the airport graft continued in the court with the prime suspect's hearing. According to György Sz. mind the police during the investigation expected statments from him against Gábor Demszki former lord mayor's deputy, Miklós Hagyó and István Kocsis former BKV-leader not much before the elections of 2010. 

According to György Sz. mind the investigation was conceptional. György Sz. used to be the legal executives of the Budapest Airport (BA) in 2008 and 2009, after he commited corrupt practices many times as the legal manager of the BKV Inc. Sz. according to the prosecutor's mind contributed in the over-billed order-contacts which were injured the two big firm's economical interests, and in exchange for this, he received severeal ten million forint slush-fund.




According to one of the counts György Sz, one of the legal executives of the BA INC. and the direct superior, the secondary co-defendant, Krisztina V. R. legal director at the end of 2008- at the beging of 2008 decided, that she ask for illegitimate profit for the owing total what comes from the legal exercises doing's order contracts which are based in the solicitor's office, mostly the order fee's 5-10 percent. 

Tomorrow Handó can explain herself

Tomorrow the Constitutional Court is going to hear Tünde Handó, the president of the National Judical Office with the coherence of Hagyó and his partner´s complaint of the constitutional right. The main point of the complaint is that the BKV-case were transposed to the Court of Kecskemét so what has proved it´s political prejudice at the Zuschlag-case, that there was no remedy chance against the verdict. 

According to András Kádár lawyer´s relation, the hearing from incomrehensible causes is gonig to happen with the lock-out of the public and the concerneds.

In the Hungarian claim history up to this point apropos of this unprecedented occasion, we had traversed the main points of the case, and Tünde Handó´s previous statements about the practice of the suit transfers.


(Photo source: nepszava.hu)

Tünde Handó, wife of József Szájer Fidesz-party EP-representator was lifted to the president chair of the OBH by the parliament in 13 of december in 2012, and she is practicing her power from 1 of january, 2012. That day the new constitution came into effect, what is together with the fundamental law's provisions makes enable Tünde Handó to decide about the questions of the court appointment.