Coercions, magisterial impositions in the Hagyó-case - SUMMARY

Gábor Tóth police superintendent during the whole investigation of the BKV case stated confidently about the process. He undertook it with name that they have the investigation in their hand and he was talking about new evidences and about conclusions what they got from the investigation testimonies.




Contrarily the testimonies which were heard in the case’s trial in Kecskemét from the defendants and from the witnesses sharply confronted with the testimonies of the concerned in the investigation period. From the main defendants and from the witnesses most of them unsaid their investigation testimonies and in the court they did a new testimony. They said about their earlier, incriminatory testimonies against others that they only did it because of police threat, in the exchange of their lives, in humiliation circumstances, it was directional and under coercion.

Ernő Mesterházy, the former advisor of Gábor Demszky on the court he offended the investigators, he called his brought to justice a recklessly violator process. He indicated that he is standing uncomprehendingly in front of the process against him which, according to him „conception, recklessly violator and it’s obligate to serve a political, human, and financial disable”. Moreover he said that according to the record the questioning was for almost 11 hours but the result was only two pages long, the investigation authorities humiliated him and tried to convince him to say an incriminatory testimony against Miklós Hagyó and if he does it than they will let him go from detention.

BKV case: was there political interest in the background?

The former manager/head of department traversed all along in his court and in his investigation testimonies that he would have worked in a criminal organization at the BKV, and that he made unneeded contracts, or he filled out untrue achievement verifications.

For his statement his defendant fellow, the former deputy lord mayor from MSZP responded with this: The testimony of Z. Tibor support what he said before in his own defense. He noted: the circumstances of the manager’s/head of department’s arrest was sorely violator. Because Z. Tibor reported in his Tuesday hearing that they announced his arrest in the TV news before they told him, then in his 51 days of pre-trial detention he couldn’t get ahold of with his 3 kids and with his wife.