The MSZP didn’t care about the defense of the
innocence either
Hagyó Miklós’s name was mired
in the beginning of the BKV case – when they couldn’t even talk about
reasonable suspicion. In the right party media (which was controlled and
supported by politicians from the right party) there were news which stated
that they have proofs about Hagyó’s malicious.
The citizens who were only interested as a layman or
they were just listening the news as an”ambient noise” could get very fob
easily, we are not really surprised on this. But we surprised that for the MSZP
– where Hagyó was hustling/working from 1998, at the age of 31 – this was
enough to ask him to stand off/resign in the beginning of February, 2010. The defense of
the innocence and the personal knowledge
during the common works weren’t even enough in the light of published
media.
As the then articles said: „According to the press information,
Antal Attila made an incriminating statement against Hagyó Miklós, the former
CEO of BKV who were suspected with a misappropriation, and Balog Zsolt the
former temporary leader of the company.”
„The MSZP got the information/learned from the media,
that the former CEO of the BKV made a statement against the former lord mayor
(she wrote here lord mayor, but he was deputy lord mayor…). The not-traversed
leak means that Hagyó Miklós will be a defendant. Here the role of the politics
are ended, the legal process will take years – said the metropolitan
vice-president of the MSZP.”
With a solid vote they
decided that they don’t want to incriminate/charge the MSZP with a case like
this, so they asked him to resign from the nomination of the individual
representative, and to resign about his „list place in Budapest” and his
mandate in the capital general assembly.
Then, from an interview in Népszava: „until the end of
the week the MSZP wants to close this case. According to our information the
party will wait for his answer until Wednesday, if the answer will be no, or he
not deciding they will start the former process, with that, they will take off
his name from both list. At the same time they can’t deposal him from his
mandate in the capital general assembly, about that only the representative can
decide.”
(They report Hagyó’s recall – source: index.hu)
The MSZP justified their decision of their presidency
(with what the then president of the party and the national leadership agreed):
„although they believe in the innocence of their party partner, but because of the
political status which evolved around him they asked him to resign, because the
interest of the party is more advanced then the personal interests.”
For the question, if they believe in the innocence of
Hagyó, then why should he resign about the representative nomination, and about
the representative of the capital, the MSZP’s president of the capital
answered: because of the weight of the
statements.
The party even in the
beginning of the case made a distance from Hagyó, then years later, on
the 25th of March, 2012, Szanyi Tibor, the socialist representative of the
parliament said in his interview to the MTI in the reference of/about Hagyó
Miklós: „with what they suspect him, he is absolutely innocent, he never
seen the Nokia box, not even a small one, not even a big one.”
So then, how is it?
Nincsenek megjegyzések:
Megjegyzés küldése